Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
Lower TDP (200W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +3%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy