Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +19%
3.226 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA107
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy