Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

AMD FirePro S9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9100 +9275%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT218
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy