Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +15740%
5.069 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
2
2816
Shading Units
40
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.84 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV610
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy