Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +1052%
5.069 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
159W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
R600
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy