AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD FirePro S7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
+108%
5.069 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1280
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
