Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +962%
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2816
Shading Units
192
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT200
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy