Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (235W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Boost Clock1019MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +61%
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1536
176
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GK104
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy