Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +140%
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
960
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GK106
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy