Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA P106 090

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +115%
5.069 TFLOPS
P106 090
2.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2017
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GP106
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy