Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +1220%
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
R600
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy