Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (200W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +52%
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Boost
3.315 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1792
176
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.315 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
828.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tahiti
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO2 (215-0821282)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy