Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XT +354%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
5120
176
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.08 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1440 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 21
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy