Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +136%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
2816
Shading Units
2816
176
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
AD107
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy