Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +427%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
160bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
2816
Shading Units
6144
176
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
130W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
AD104
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy