Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (185W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +45%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
2816
Shading Units
2304
176
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
185W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU106
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy