Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV516
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy