Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +13330%
5.238 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2816
Shading Units
16
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
18W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT218
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy