Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV560
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy