Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FireGL V5600

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +4059%
7.987 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR4
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
3
4096
Shading Units
120
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV630
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
89W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy