Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +1179%
7.987 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Feb 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
6
4096
Shading Units
480
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Turks
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy