Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +1200%
7.987 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
8
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Cayman
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy