CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro W9000
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro W9000
VS
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
AMD FirePro W9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (274W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
+99%
7.987 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
VS
FirePro W9000
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
32
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
Tahiti
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
300W
TDP
274W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
2
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs Intel Arc Pro A40
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
4
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
5
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro RG220A
6
AMD Radeon HD 6770 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
7
Intel Arc A780 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
8
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro S9100
9
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
10
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy