AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
+22720%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
GT216
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.0
Shader Model
4.1
