Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +336%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
TU117
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy