Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +175%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
80
4096
Shading Units
5120
256
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Navi 21
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy