Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +539%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Lexa
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy