Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +707%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
5376
256
TMUs
336
64
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Navi 31
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy