ATI FirePro V3700 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
40 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
Lower TDP (20W vs 32W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
RV380
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
