Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3700 vs AMD FireStream 9270

ATI FirePro V3700 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270 +1775%
1.2 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
RV770
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net