Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI FirePro V3750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (48W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +52%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GT200
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

48W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy