Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3750 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

ATI FirePro V3750 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (48W vs 150W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3750 +22%
0.352 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
3
320
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.212 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.212 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
R600
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GPU Variant
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

48W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy