Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel Arc A780

ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel Arc A780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Arc A780 +3365%
18.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
4096
20
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
DG2-512
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy