Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM +305%
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
960
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GK106
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy