Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD FirePro W8000

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +520%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Tahiti
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy