Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 49W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 +54%
0.803 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
40.06GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
384
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.368 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
803.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.47 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GK208
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK208-400-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy