Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +945%
5.437 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
400
Shading Units
1536
20
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.96 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
169.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.87 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.437 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
169.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
120W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
TU116
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU116-400-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy