Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
184 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +3%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
400
Shading Units
216
20
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GT200B
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy