Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +251%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GM206
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy