Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA L20

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA L20

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 48GB VRAM L20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 275W)
NVIDIA L20 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
11376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
L20 +11313%
59.35 TFLOPS
VS
L20

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2023
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
92
400
Shading Units
11776
20
TMUs
368
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
92
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
927.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.35 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
59.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
927.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
AD102
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy