Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +3800%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
4608
20
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 21
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy