Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

ATI FirePro V3800 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +1948%
10.65 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
4096
20
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
Unknown
104 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net