Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 5050 +2380%
12.9 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2025
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
400
Shading Units
2560
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GB207
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
GB207
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
0 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
Unknown
104 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
9.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy