Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA P102 100

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA P102 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
P102 100 +1971%
10.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2018
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1582 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
400
Shading Units
3200
20
TMUs
200
8
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GP102
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy