Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +1967%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
56
400
Shading Units
3584
20
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Vega 10
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy