Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R9 370

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R9 370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 110W)
AMD Radeon R9 370 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 370 +380%
2.496 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
975 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
1280
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.496 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
156.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
110W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Trinidad
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Trinidad PRO (215-0870020)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy