Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5700 +1428%
7.949 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1465 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
2304
20
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.4 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
248.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.90 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.949 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
496.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
180W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 10
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XL (215-0917220)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy