Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs Intel Arc A350

ATI FirePro V3900 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +392%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
DG2-128
Turks GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy