Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
16416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +9848%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
480
Shading Units
16896
24
TMUs
528
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
1000W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GB100
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
208 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy