Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +1674%
11.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
480
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
TU102
Turks GL
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy